do you think that these are the best solutions for you problem?

Advantages and disadvantages of accredited health and safety training

With regard to training in health and safety, one of the issues to consider is whether you and / or your employees need a training course approved or not approved. As with most things in life, there are advantages and disadvantages of each.

program content

training courses such as safety NEBOSH Certificate (general construction, fire and environment), ConstructionSkills (SMSTS and SSSTS) IOSH accredited Health (Safety Director to work, etc.) have to follow specific programs to meet the criteria evaluation. This means that you can have large sections that are not relevant to every person in the course and their specific work, which could lead to boring delegates and "OFF". This might not be a problem for the party that is not relevant to them, but if they do not "recommit" to teach the relevant information, you run the risk of losing potentially critical information. There is also a risk of distracting others in the course you need to understand what is taught.

Unlike accredited courses, as mentioned above should follow the specific programs that are not accredited may be tailored to specific occupational hazards of an organization and working methods. This means that the subject is likely to be much more relevant to participants. A non-accredited courses can even integrate policy procedures and emergency health and safety organization in the subject taught.

They can not be adjusted, but do not forget the statute

One advantage of a training course on health and safety only reputable suppliers that have already been approved by the Authority for permission to offer their courses. This allows more quiet (very important when parting with a lot of money!) What are the educational standards have been assessed as meeting a certain level and the success rates are consistently good.

The fact that the programs are consistent, the same examinations for suppliers, which means that those who have acquired the qualification will be considered as having a high level of skill and knowledge about health and safety, they have passed the necessary evaluation, while a non-accredited qualification could be attributed to a person after attending a course that is too easy and, more pertinently, does not provide the necessary knowledge to work safely or other management to work . Just because someone has a nice looking certificate does not mean they can not play their role in the back of a prerequisite for the job if you do not have enough knowledge to go with it. Those who have a real certificate from a recognized and respected certification can show others who have this knowledge while displaying the certificate.

But it can come at a price. For those who are an accredited health and safety training, there is often a large amount of heavy equipment and textbooks are included in the course fee and must be purchased as a supplement added, and the registration of the examination and certification of official fees. You can also be a long wait to receive test results and certificates after completing an accredited course, which can be particularly frustrating for those who need training before starting or apply for jobs.

Conclusion

So in conclusion, or authorized or unauthorized training can be defined as "better" than its capacity not only depends on the needs of the person or company requesting the training, but also in the quality of the organization training to teach the course.

ATC Risk Management offers two courses accredited by bodies such as NEBOSH, IOSH, City & Guilds, etc. as well as providing a non-approved health and safety training on many issues, including needles, COSHH, the training in manual handling, working at height and fire safety training.

No comments:

Post a Comment